Read this doc on Scribd: Alan Boxer v. Stranahan – Denied
1 DCLSE) MAY 0 2 2008 SUPERl&k COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORN1 COUNTY OF MARIN EL Omctr 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ALAN BOXER, Plaintiff, v. Consolidated Cases Nos. CV 051280 ) CV 051282 10 11 12 13 14 LAUREN BOXER, AKA LAUREN STRANAHAN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ORDERS AFTER HEARING TO STOP HARASSMENT 15 16 ALAN BOXER, Plaintiff, v. 17 18 19 20 21 22 LEE R. STRANAHAN, Defendant. 23 On May 1, 2008, these consolidated matters came on for an evidentiary hearing on the 24 25 Plaintiffs Requests for Orders to Stop Harassment. Four witnesses testified, to wit: the Plaintiff and his wife, and both of the Defendants, who are the Plaintiffs daughter and son-in-law Exhibits were admitted into evidence. While it is quite clear that the Defendants do in fact communicate about the Plaintiff in £ 26 27 28 negative manner and disseminate court documents concerning him over the Internet and that ORDER AFTER HEARING TO STOP HARASSMENT 1 2 3 4 these communications are understandably upsetting to the Plaintiff, there is not clear and convincing evidence that these communications legally constitute harassment. Rather, it appear: that they constitute the Defendants’ legitimate, although perhaps unpleasant, exercise of theii right to communicate about their opinions about the Plaintiff and his alleged acts and omission in the past and his petitions for retraining orders against them. 5 6 7 Accordingly, the Requests for Orders to Stop Harassment must be denied. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, it is ordered that: 1. The Requests for Orders to Stop Harassment are DENIED; and 8 9 10 11 2. The Temporary Restraining Orders that were reissued on May 1, 2008 are VACATED Date: May 2, 2008 w . Roy O^Chernus Commissioner 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER AFTER HEARING TO STOP HARASSMENT
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
of and poker series world poker series world of event